ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs NVS 300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 300 400 CX FX 380 LP FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 5800 Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla S1070 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 300 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

NVS 300
2011, $109
512 MB DDR3, 18 Watt
0.28

Mobility HD 5650 outperforms NVS 300 by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
NVS 300 NVS 300
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14051079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.206.47
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT218Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date8 January 2011 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16400
Core clock speed520 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors260 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1609.000
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs820
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Full HD3−4
−433%
16
+433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p36.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how NVS 300 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 400% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 433% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.28 1.26
Recency 8 January 2011 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

NVS 300 has an age advantage of 1 year.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 300 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 300 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
NVS 295 Quadro NVS 295
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
GT 630M GeForce GT 630M
NVS 300 NVS 300
vs
NVS 420 Quadro NVS 420
5000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
5000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
vs
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X
5000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
vs
H800 PCIe 80 GB PCIe 80 GB
5000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
vs
H100 SXM5 64 GB SXM5 64 GB
5000 SDI NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
vs
H100 NVL 94 GB NVL 94 GB
NVS 300 NVIDIA NVS 300
vs
E9172 MXM Radeon E9172 MXM
NVS 300 NVIDIA NVS 300
vs
RTX 4070 Ti RTX 4070 Ti
NVS 300 NVIDIA NVS 300
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
NVS 300 NVIDIA NVS 300
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU Max 30-Core GPU
NVS 300 NVIDIA NVS 300
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Graphics 64EU Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 51 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 285 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 300 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.