GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs Quadro 3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 3000M with GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 3000M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
2.58

RTX 3050 OEM outperforms 3000M by a whopping 1101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking821178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Power efficiency2.3616.33
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF104GA106
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402560
Core clock speed450 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate18.00140.4
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 3000M 2.58
RTX 3050 OEM 30.98
+1101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 3000M 995
RTX 3050 OEM 11934
+1099%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
−1076%
600−650
+1076%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.82no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1084%
450−500
+1084%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1084%
450−500
+1084%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−1100%
240−250
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1054%
150−160
+1054%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1084%
450−500
+1084%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−1100%
180−190
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

This is how Quadro 3000M and RTX 3050 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 OEM is 1076% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.58 30.98
Recency 22 February 2011 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

Quadro 3000M has 73.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has a 1100.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 3000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 49 votes

Rate Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 164 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.