NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs K2000M
Comparison of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Quadro 2000M 3.76
K2000M 4.84 +28.7%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
Quadro 2000M 1261
K2000M 1798 +42.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
Quadro 2000M 6634
K2000M 7947 +19.8%
Quadro 2000M 816
K2000M 1051 +28.8%
Octane Render OctaneBench
Quadro 2000M 7
K2000M 9 +28.6%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s +50%
18 Mh/s −50%
Let's see how good Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cheaper ($46.56 vs $265.27)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
28.7% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 June 2012 vs 13 January 2011)
More pipelines (384 vs 192)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 40 nm)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, Quadro 2000M or K2000M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro K2000M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K2000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.