Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Quadro 2000D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2000 2000D 4000 4000 Mac Edition 4100 5000 5000 SDI 6000 6000 SDI 7000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 2000D with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 2000D
2011, $599
1 GB GDDR5, 62 Watt
2.34

6650 XT outperforms 2000D by a whopping 1649% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking899112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0756.66
Power efficiency2.9117.91
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF106Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 October 2011 (14 years ago)10 May 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6650 XT has 80843% better value for money than Quadro 2000D.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed625 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00337.3
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache256 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed650 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 2000D 2.34
RX 6650 XT 40.93
+1649%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 2000D 980
Samples: 179
RX 6650 XT 17122
+1647%
Samples: 4997

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1871%
138
+1871%
1440p3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%
4K2−3
−1700%
36
+1700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p85.57
−2860%
2.89
+2860%
1440p199.67
−3353%
5.78
+3353%
4K299.50
−2602%
11.08
+2602%
  • RX 6650 XT has 2860% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT has 3353% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT has 2602% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 225
+0%
225
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 198
+0%
198
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro 2000D and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 1871% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 2200% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 1700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.34 40.93
Recency 5 October 2011 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 176 Watt

Quadro 2000D has 184% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 1649% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000D is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
vs
Quadro CX Quadro CX
Quadro 2000D 2000D
vs
ATI HD 5450 HD 5450
Quadro 2000D 2000D
vs
FX 560 FX 560
Quadro 2000D 2000D
vs
RX Vega 64 Nano RX Vega 64 Nano
Quadro 2000D 2000D
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
Quadro 2000D 2000D
vs
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
6000 SDI 6000 SDI
vs
ATI 9000 PRO 9000 PRO
6000 SDI 6000 SDI
vs
FX 600 PCI FX 600 PCI
6000 SDI 6000 SDI
vs
RX 570 X2 RX 570 X2
6000 SDI 6000 SDI
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
vs
Radeon Next Next

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 27 votes

Rate Quadro 2000D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4177 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 2000D or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.