GeForce GT 630M vs Quadro 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro 2000
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 62 Watt
2.45
+75%

Quadro 2000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking800959
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.400.02
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF106N13P-GL/GL2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 December 2010 (13 years ago)6 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data
Current price$141 (0.2x MSRP)$1121

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 2000 has 1900% better value for money than GT 630M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19296
CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed625 MHzUp to 800 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00Up to 12.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance480.0 gflops253.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro 2000 and GeForce GT 630M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length178 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 BitUp to 128bit
Memory clock speed2600 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth41.6 GB/sUp to 32.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Rayno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
DirectX 11.2no data12 API
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 2000 2.45
+75%
GT 630M 1.40

Quadro 2000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 2000 948
+75.9%
GT 630M 539

Quadro 2000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 76% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro 2000 3905
+65.7%
GT 630M 2356

Quadro 2000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 66% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro 2000 12
+71.4%
GT 630M 7

Quadro 2000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 71% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p30−35
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
Full HD27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 1.40
Recency 24 December 2010 6 December 2011
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 33 Watt

The Quadro 2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 2000 is a workstation card while GeForce GT 630M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
GeForce GT 630M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 290 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 849 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.