Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro 1000M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 987 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Fermi | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 27 February 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $174.95 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 60 Watt (35 - 60 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 11.20 | no data |
| Floating-point performance | 0.2688 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 February 2011 | 27 February 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 60 Watt |
Quadro 1000M has 33.3% lower power consumption.
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 1000M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 1000M is a mobile workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
