Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro 1000M

Place in the ranking	991	205
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.18	no data
Power efficiency	2.25	53.81
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF108	AD107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 January 2011 (14 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$174.95	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	2048
Core clock speed	700 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.20	129.6
Floating-point processing power	0.2688 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	16	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	2.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 1000M 1.47

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.36
+1761%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 1000M 943

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+2046%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 1000M 4566

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+1352%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1760%

800−850
+1760%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

4.07

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1757%	130−140 +1757%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Dota 2	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Elden Ring	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1718%	200−210 +1718%
Fortnite	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −1713%	290−300 +1713%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −1757%	130−140 +1757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −1757%	130−140 +1757%
World of Tanks	30−35 −1674%	550−600 +1674%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Dota 2	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −1718%	200−210 +1718%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −1713%	290−300 +1713%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1678%	160−170 +1678%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1700%	90−95 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1733%	55−60 +1733%
Valorant	7−8 −1757%	130−140 +1757%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1713%	290−300 +1713%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1700%	270−280 +1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1700%	270−280 +1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Dota 2	16−18 −1713%	290−300 +1713%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Valorant	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

This is how Quadro 1000M and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 1760% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.47	27.36
Recency	13 January 2011	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 1761.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 1000M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.