Xbox Series X GPU vs Playstation 3 RSX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD2991Scarlett
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 November 2006 (17 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3328
Core clock speed550 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors300 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rateno data379.6
Floating-point performanceno data12.15 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Lengthno data301 mm
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data10 GB
Memory bus widthno data320 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2006 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 200 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX has 146.9% lower power consumption.

Xbox Series X GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX and Xbox Series X GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX
Playstation 3 RSX
AMD Xbox Series X GPU
Xbox Series X GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 67 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1207 votes

Rate Xbox Series X GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.