RTX A500 Mobile vs Playstation 3 RSX 40nm

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.63
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRSX-CXD5302GA107S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 October 2012 (11 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed550 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1537 MHz
Number of transistors302 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate13.2098.37
Floating-point processing powerno data6.296 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLES 1.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 October 2012 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 60 Watt

Playstation 3 RSX 40nm has 71.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Playstation 3 RSX 40nm and RTX A500 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Playstation 3 RSX 40nm is a desktop card while RTX A500 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 40nm
Playstation 3 RSX 40nm
NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
RTX A500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 40nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 75 votes

Rate RTX A500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.