Radeon RX 6650 XT vs P102-100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 5800 Radeon RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared P102-100 with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

P102-100
2018
5 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
7.64

RX 6650 XT outperforms P102-100 by a whopping 483% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P102-100 P102-100
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53781
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.2162.73
Power efficiency2.1017.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 February 2018 (7 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6650 XT has 1854% better value for money than P102-100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32002048
Core clock speed1582 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate336.6337.3
Floating-point processing power10.77 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs200128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth440.3 GB/s280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P102-100 7.64
RX 6650 XT 44.57
+483%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P102-100 2945
RX 6650 XT 17171
+483%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−492%
142
+492%
1440p10−12
−560%
66
+560%
4K6−7
−500%
36
+500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.96
−788%
2.81
+788%
1440p59.90
−891%
6.05
+891%
4K99.83
−801%
11.08
+801%
  • RX 6650 XT has 788% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT has 891% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT has 801% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 212
+0%
212
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 153
+0%
153
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 108
+0%
108
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 89
+0%
89
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 171
+0%
171
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 182
+0%
182
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 136
+0%
136
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 107
+0%
107
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8
+0%
8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how P102-100 and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 492% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 560% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.64 44.57
Recency 12 February 2018 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 176 Watt

RX 6650 XT has a 483.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 42% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the P102-100 in performance tests.

Be aware that P102-100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P102-100 P102 100
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
RX 7600 XT Radeon RX 7600 XT
P102-100 P102 100
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
9500M G 9500M G
vs
HD 8400 HD 8400
RTX 4060 Ti RTX 4060 Ti
vs
Quadro GV100 GV100
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
RX Vega 2 RX Vega 2
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
T2000 Mobile T2000 Mobile
vs
RTX 8000 RTX 8000
RTX 4070 RTX 4070
vs
G550 PCIe
RX 6600S RX 6600S
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Mobile
RTX A2000 Max-Q RTX A2000 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Arc A750 Arc A750
vs
Xbox One S GPU Xbox One S GPU
Radeon E8950 E8950
vs
GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 34 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3575 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about P102-100 or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.