GeForce MX550 vs NX-SoC

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.69
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM20BTU117S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2017 (7 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed384 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed768 MHz1320 MHz
Number of transistors2,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology20 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.2942.24
Floating-point processing power0.3932 TFLOPS2.703 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.37.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2017 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 20 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

NX-SoC has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NX-SoC and GeForce MX550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NX-SoC
NX-SoC
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
GeForce MX550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate NX-SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 773 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.