Riva TNT2 vs NVS 810

Place in the ranking	851	1592
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.10	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code name	GM107	NV5
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 November 2015 (10 years ago)	12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512 ×2	no data
Core clock speed	902 MHz	125 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	15 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	33.06 ×2	0.25
Floating-point processing power	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	no data
ROPs	16 ×2	2
TMUs	32 ×2	2
L1 Cache	256 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1024 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	198 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	SDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB ×2	16 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit ×2	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s ×2	2.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

8x mini-DisplayPort

1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	6.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.2
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.74
+27300%

Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1146
+38100%

Samples: 32

Riva TNT2 3
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.74	0.01
Recency	4 November 2015	12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	16 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	250 nm

NVS 810 has a 27300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 793% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 is a desktop one.