ATI Radeon 9200 vs NVS 810

Place in the ranking	832	1589
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.21	0.03
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GM107	RV280
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 November 2015 (10 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512 ×2	no data
Core clock speed	902 MHz	250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.06 ×2	1.000
Floating-point processing power	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	no data
ROPs	16 ×2	4
TMUs	32 ×2	4
L1 Cache	256 KB	no data
L2 Cache	1024 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 8x
Length	198 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB ×2	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit ×2	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s ×2	6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

8x mini-DisplayPort

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	8.1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.84
+28300%

ATI 9200 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1189
+39533%

Samples: 30

ATI 9200 3
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.84	0.01
Recency	4 November 2015	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	28 Watt

NVS 810 has a 28300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200, on the other hand, has 142.9% lower power consumption.

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 is a desktop one.