RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 with RTX A2000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
2.74

RTX A2000 Embedded outperforms NVS 810 by a whopping 870% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.1058.48
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGM107GA107S
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date4 November 2015 (10 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×22560
Core clock speed902 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1177 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×294.16
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×26.026 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×232
TMUs32 ×280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache256 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×296 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.74
RTX A2000 Embedded 26.58
+870%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1146
Samples: 32
RTX A2000 Embedded 11117
+870%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.74 26.58
Recency 4 November 2015 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A2000 Embedded has a 870% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.