FireStream 9170 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 with FireStream 9170, including specs and performance data.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
3.05
+81.5%

NVS 810 outperforms FireStream 9170 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking727898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.110.02
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM107RV670
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 November 2015 (8 years ago)8 November 2007 (16 years ago)
Current price$848 $360

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

NVS 810 has 450% better value for money than FireStream 9170.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512320
Core clock speed902 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million666 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt105 Watt
Texture fill rate33.0612.80
Floating-point performance2x 1,058 gflops512.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 810 3.05
+81.5%
FireStream 9170 1.68

NVS 810 outperforms FireStream 9170 by 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 810 1179
+82.2%
FireStream 9170 647

NVS 810 outperforms FireStream 9170 by 82% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.05 1.68
Recency 4 November 2015 8 November 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 105 Watt

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9170 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 810 is a workstation graphics card while FireStream 9170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
AMD FireStream 9170
FireStream 9170

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate FireStream 9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.