Arc Pro B60 vs NVS 810

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 810 and Arc Pro B60, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 810
2015
2 GB DDR3, 68 Watt
2.69

Pro B60 outperforms 810 by a whopping 1000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking820197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.75
Power efficiency3.1911.92
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameGM107BMG-G21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date4 November 2015 (9 years ago)5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512 ×22560
Core clock speed902 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06 ×2384.0
Floating-point processing power1.058 TFLOPS ×212.29 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×216
TMUs32 ×2160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Length198 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB ×224 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s ×2456.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors8x mini-DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.4
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 810 2.69
Arc Pro B60 29.58
+1000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 810 1191
Samples: 29
Arc Pro B60 13079
+998%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 29.58
Recency 4 November 2015 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 200 Watt

NVS 810 has 194.1% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has a 999.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B60 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 810 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 810
NVS 810
Intel Arc Pro B60
Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 810 or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.