GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs NVS 5400M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking951not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.21no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF108NV34 B1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed660 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors585 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.561.000
Floating-point processing power0.2534 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2012 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

NVS 5400M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between NVS 5400M and GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that NVS 5400M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5400M
NVS 5400M
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 45 votes

Rate NVS 5400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.