ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs NVS 5200M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 5200M with Radeon HD 4650 AGP, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5200M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 25 Watt
1.26
+147%

NVS 5200M outperforms ATI HD 4650 AGP by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10321232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.650.77
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF117RV730
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)10 September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96320
Core clock speed625 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors585 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0019.20
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXMAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 5200M 1.26
+147%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 5200M 508
+145%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
+150%
4−5
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
World of Tanks 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Dota 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

This is how NVS 5200M and ATI HD 4650 AGP compete in popular games:

  • NVS 5200M is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 0.51
Recency 1 June 2012 10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 48 Watt

NVS 5200M has a 147.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.

The NVS 5200M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 5200M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 5200M
NVS 5200M
ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 153 votes

Rate NVS 5200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.