Radeon RX 7600S vs NVS 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K160Q K180Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 510 with Radeon RX 7600S, including specs and performance data.

NVS 510
2012, $449
2 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.63

7600S outperforms NVS 510 by a whopping 2181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
NVS 510 NVS 510
RX 7600S RX 7600S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking989139
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency3.5838.06
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921792
Core clock speed797 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate12.75246.4
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache16 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length160 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 510 1.63
RX 7600S 37.18
+2181%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 510 680
Samples: 369
RX 7600S 15549
+2187%
Samples: 202

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
1440p2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
4K1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p112.25no data
1440p224.50no data
4K449.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 191
+0%
191
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+0%
126
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+0%
95
+0%
Valorant 179
+0%
179
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 64
+0%
64
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
+0%
43
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how NVS 510 and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600S is 2450% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600S is 2500% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600S is 2600% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.63 37.18
Recency 23 October 2012 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 510 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 2181% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 510 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA NVS 510
NVS 510
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
Radeon RX 7600S
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
FireStream 9170 FireStream 9170
RX 7600S Radeon RX 7600S
vs
RX 7700S Radeon RX 7700S
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
Quadro K600 Quadro K600
Tesla K20X Tesla K20X
vs
NVS 50 PCI 50 PCI
Tesla K20X Tesla K20X
vs
RTX 2080 Super 2080 Super
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
ATI Rage 128 PRO 128 PRO
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
Tesla M1060 M1060
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RX 640 640
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
GRID K500 K500
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
FX 5800 Ultra 5800 Ultra
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile 4070 Mobile
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
HD 8550M 8550M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 69 votes

Rate NVS 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 255 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 510 or Radeon RX 7600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.