GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVS 4200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 4200M with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

NVS 4200M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 25 Watt
0.68

4060 Mobile outperforms 4200M by a whopping 5701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1207105
Place by popularitynot in top-10041
Power efficiency2.1927.62
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF119AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483072
Core clock speed810 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1890 MHz
Number of transistors292 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate6.480181.4
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs896
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache64 KB3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXMPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 4200M 0.68
RTX 4060 Mobile 39.45
+5701%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 4200M 302
Samples: 1424
RTX 4060 Mobile 17443
+5676%
Samples: 13617

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

NVS 4200M 507
RTX 4060 Mobile 35770
+6955%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 4200M 2298
RTX 4060 Mobile 90275
+3828%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−762%
112
+762%
1440p1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%
4K0−138

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6050%
123
+6050%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1833%
116
+1833%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12700%
128
+12700%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3140%
160−170
+3140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1467%
94
+1467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
Valorant 27−30
−724%
230−240
+724%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1290%
270−280
+1290%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4100%
84
+4100%
Dota 2 12−14
−1162%
164
+1162%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12800%
129
+12800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3140%
160−170
+3140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1167%
76
+1167%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−3083%
191
+3083%
Valorant 27−30
−724%
230−240
+724%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3750%
77
+3750%
Dota 2 12−14
−1100%
156
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12400%
125
+12400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3140%
160−170
+3140%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−983%
65
+983%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1925%
160−170
+1925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1583%
101
+1583%
Valorant 27−30
−724%
230−240
+724%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−9733%
290−300
+9733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 49
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6050%
120−130
+6050%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 44
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7500%
76
+7500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−11200%
110−120
+11200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
76
+407%
Valorant 4−5
−6275%
250−260
+6275%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2750%
55−60
+2750%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how NVS 4200M and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 762% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 6100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 12800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile performs better in 36 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 39.45
Recency 22 February 2011 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 115 Watt

NVS 4200M has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 5701.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 4200M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 172 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4423 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 4200M or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.