RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs NVS 300

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 300 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 300
2011
512 MB DDR3, 18 Watt
0.29

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms NVS 300 by a whopping 28176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138710
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.2521.19
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT218GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 January 2011 (14 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1614080
Core clock speed520 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2377 MHz
Number of transistors260 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.1601,045.9
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS66.94 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cacheno data13.8 MB
L2 Cache32 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-594x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.212.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 300 0.29
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 82.00
+28176%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 300 121
Samples: 351
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 34700
+28578%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 82.00
Recency 8 January 2011 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 300 Watt

NVS 300 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 28175.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 300
NVS 300
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 50 votes

Rate NVS 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 327 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about NVS 300 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.