RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs Quadro FX 4800

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4800 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 4800
2008
1536 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.27

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms FX 4800 by a whopping 4305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8781
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.2226.93
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT200BGB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19214080
Core clock speed602 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate38.531,151
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS73.69 TFLOPS
ROPs24176
TMUs64440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L2 Cache192 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB48 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.312.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 4800 2.27
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 100.00
+4305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4800 1004
Samples: 501
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 45357
+4418%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 100.00
Recency 11 November 2008 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

FX 4800 has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 4305.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4800 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 68 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 218 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.