L20 vs NVS 2100M

Place in the ranking	1366	189
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.30	8.97
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GT218	AD102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	16 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	11776
Core clock speed	535 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	275 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.280	927.4
Floating-point processing power	0.03936 TFLOPS	59.35 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	128
TMUs	8	368
Tensor Cores	no data	368
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	92
L1 Cache	no data	11.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 KB	96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.64 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.2	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 2100M 0.33

L20 32.11
+9630%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M 136
Samples: 64

L20 13429
+9774%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077

1−2

−9400%

95−100
+9400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −9186%	650−700 +9186%
Valorant	24−27 −9515%	2500−2550 +9515%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	14−16 −9543%	1350−1400 +9543%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
Dota 2	10−11 −9400%	950−1000 +9400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −9186%	650−700 +9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −8900%	450−500 +8900%
Valorant	24−27 −9515%	2500−2550 +9515%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
Dota 2	10−11 −9400%	950−1000 +9400%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −8650%	350−400 +8650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −9186%	650−700 +9186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −8900%	450−500 +8900%
Valorant	24−27 −9515%	2500−2550 +9515%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −9567%	290−300 +9567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −9567%	290−300 +9567%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov	2−3 −9400%	190−200 +9400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −9400%	95−100 +9400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −9543%	1350−1400 +9543%
Valorant	2−3 −9400%	190−200 +9400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−9400%

95−100
+9400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3
−9400%

190−200

+9400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.33	32.11
Recency	7 January 2010	16 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	48 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	11 Watt	275 Watt

NVS 2100M has 2400% lower power consumption.

L20, on the other hand, has a 9630.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The L20 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while L20 is a workstation one.