ATI Radeon 9700 PRO vs ATI Mobility X300

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameM22R300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2005 (19 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed350 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed350 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate1.4002.600
ROPs48
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth4 GB/s19.84 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0b9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2005 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 110 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility X300 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X300 and Radeon 9700 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X300 is a notebook card while Radeon 9700 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X300
Mobility Radeon X300
ATI Radeon 9700 PRO
Radeon 9700 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.