GRID K200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1350

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameM62GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 September 2006 (18 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$235

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61536
Core clock speed371 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed470 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.48495.36
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed324 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.184 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 September 2006 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm

GRID K200 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X1350 and GRID K200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X1350 is a notebook card while GRID K200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X1350
Mobility Radeon X1350
NVIDIA GRID K200
GRID K200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.