Quadro P3200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5870 with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5870
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.96

P3200 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5870 by a whopping 668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking781246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.1321.13
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameBroadwayGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001792
Core clock speed700 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00172.8
Floating-point processing power1.12 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5870 2.96
Quadro P3200 22.74
+668%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5870 7999
Quadro P3200 45999
+475%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p31
−642%
230−240
+642%
Full HD39
−115%
84
+115%
4K3−4
−833%
28
+833%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−622%
65
+622%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−783%
50−55
+783%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−756%
130−140
+756%
Hitman 3 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−386%
100−110
+386%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−975%
129
+975%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−154%
95−100
+154%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−878%
88
+878%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−783%
50−55
+783%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−756%
130−140
+756%
Hitman 3 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−386%
100−110
+386%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−542%
75−80
+542%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−154%
95−100
+154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−344%
40
+344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−783%
50−55
+783%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−350%
72
+350%
Hitman 3 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−386%
100−110
+386%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−542%
75−80
+542%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−229%
46
+229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−154%
95−100
+154%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−780%
40−45
+780%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Hitman 3 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−633%
130−140
+633%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−533%
35−40
+533%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 30−35
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5870 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 642% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P3200 is 115% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 833% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 3800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 61 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.96 22.74
Recency 7 January 2010 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 has 50% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 668.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 53 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 294 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.