GeForce2 Go vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5870 and GeForce2 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5870
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.97
+29600%

ATI Mobility HD 5870 outperforms GeForce2 Go by a whopping 29600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7841512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.100.34
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameBroadwayNV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)11 November 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed700 MHz143 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate28.000.57
Floating-point processing power1.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs404

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p31-0−1
Full HD38-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Fortnite 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 50−55 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
World of Tanks 20−22 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 10−11 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Valorant 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.97 0.01
Recency 7 January 2010 11 November 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 2 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 has a 29600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 Go, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Mobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIA GeForce2 Go
GeForce2 Go

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 69 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.