GeForce 8400 GS vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870

Place in the ranking	782	1256
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.05	0.68
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Broadway	G86
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$29.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	16
Core clock speed	700 MHz	459 MHz
Number of transistors	1,040 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	28.00	3.672
Floating-point processing power	1.12 TFLOPS	0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	40	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	170 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Standard memory config per GPU	no data	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	6.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	-	1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	31 +675%	4−5 −675%
Full HD	39 +680%	5−6 −680%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

6.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Hitman 3	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Hitman 3	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Hitman 3	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +680%	5−6 −680%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Hitman 3	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

0−1

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5870 and 8400 GS compete in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 5870 is 675% faster in 900p
ATI Mobility HD 5870 is 680% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.96	0.40
Recency	7 January 2010	17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	40 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 has a 640% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is a notebook card while GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.