GeForce 9500 GT vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire with GeForce 9500 GT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire
2010
2x1 GB DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5, 120 Watt
4.78
+1038%

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire outperforms 9500 GT by a whopping 1038% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6461259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.810.59
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBroadway-XTG96
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)29 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160032
Core clock speed700 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rateno data9.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.096 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataDual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Full HD52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data21.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Valorant 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Fortnite 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Valorant 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
World of Tanks 80−85
+1043%
7−8
−1043%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Valorant 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
World of Tanks 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Valorant 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire and 9500 GT compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 1225% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 0.42
Recency 7 January 2010 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire has a 1038.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GT, on the other hand, has 140% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire is a notebook card while GeForce 9500 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9500 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 6 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1281 vote

Rate GeForce 9500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.