GeForce GT 635M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5850 and GeForce GT 635M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5850
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.91
+31.7%

ATI Mobility HD 5850 outperforms GT 635M by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking909995
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.392.86
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBroadwayGF116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800Up to 144
Core clock speed500 MHzUp to 675 MHz
Boost clock speedno data753 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.0016.20
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS0.3888 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 BitUp to 192bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sUp to 43.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 API
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5850 1.91
+31.7%
GT 635M 1.45

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5850 5592
+11.9%
GT 635M 4995

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Full HD23
−8.7%
25
+8.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Fortnite 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
World of Tanks 35−40
+2.8%
36
−2.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5850 and GT 635M compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5850 is 36% faster in 900p
  • GT 635M is 9% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Elden Ring, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 5850 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5850 is ahead in 34 tests (77%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 1.45
Recency 7 January 2010 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5850 has a 31.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

GT 635M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 635M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
GeForce GT 635M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 468 votes

Rate GeForce GT 635M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.