RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5730

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5730 with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.


ATI Mobility HD 5730
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 26 Watt
1.31

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms Mobility HD 5730 by a whopping 3505% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8836.37
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMadisonAD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4005120
Core clock speed650 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors627 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate13.00247.2
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache40 KB5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Full HD18
−3233%
600−650
+3233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Fortnite 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3400%
280−290
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
Valorant 30−35
−3429%
1200−1250
+3429%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
−3400%
1050−1100
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 16−18
−3429%
600−650
+3429%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Fortnite 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3400%
280−290
+3400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
Valorant 30−35
−3429%
1200−1250
+3429%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 16−18
−3429%
600−650
+3429%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3400%
280−290
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3471%
250−260
+3471%
Valorant 30−35
−3429%
1200−1250
+3429%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Valorant 4−5
−3400%
140−150
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3471%
500−550
+3471%
Valorant 6−7
−3400%
210−220
+3400%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−3400%
70−75
+3400%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5730 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 3471% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is 3233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 47.23
Recency 7 January 2010 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 26 Watt 100 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5730 has 285% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3505% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5730 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5730 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 48 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5730 or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.