UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1012not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameMadison ProGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40032
Core clock speed450 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors627 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-19 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000no data
Floating-point performance0.36 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Intel UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 258 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.