Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Combined performance score
Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 3558% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 968 | 53 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 9.49 |
Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Turing (2018−2021) |
GPU code name | Madison Pro | TU102 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years old) | 13 August 2018 (5 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,999 |
Current price | $24 | $3230 (0.3x MSRP) |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 400 | 4608 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 650 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Number of transistors | 627 million | 18,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15-19 Watt | 260 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 9.000 | 509.8 |
Floating-point performance | 360.0 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 48 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 15
−3233%
| 500−550
+3233%
|
Full HD | 16
−3338%
| 550−600
+3338%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−3233%
|
300−310
+3233%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−3471%
|
250−260
+3471%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−3233%
|
300−310
+3233%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−3471%
|
250−260
+3471%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3233%
|
100−105
+3233%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−3400%
|
140−150
+3400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−3233%
|
300−310
+3233%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−3500%
|
180−190
+3500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−3400%
|
70−75
+3400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−3525%
|
290−300
+3525%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−3233%
|
100−105
+3233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−3500%
|
180−190
+3500%
|
This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:
900p resolution:
- RTX 8000 is 3233% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650
1080p resolution:
- RTX 8000 is 3338% faster than ATI Mobility HD 5650
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.36 | 49.75 |
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 13 August 2018 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 48 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 260 Watt |
The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.
Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.