GeForce G105M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 560v and GeForce G105M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ATI Mobility HD 560v outperforms G105M by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1180 | 1350 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 4.01 | 1.74 |
Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
GPU code name | M96 | GT218 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 May 2010 (15 years ago) | 16 July 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 500 MHz |
Number of transistors | 514 million | 260 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 14 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 4.000 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.352 TFLOPS | 0.03424 TFLOPS |
Gigaflops | no data | 38 |
ROPs | 8 | 4 |
TMUs | 32 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | Up to 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3) |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | VGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Power management | no data | 8.0 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
God of War | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
God of War | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
+175%
|
8−9
−175%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
God of War | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
God of War | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+190%
|
10−11
−190%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
Valorant | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.79 | 0.32 |
Recency | 5 May 2010 | 16 July 2009 |
Chip lithography | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 14 Watt |
ATI Mobility HD 560v has a 146.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.
GeForce G105M, on the other hand, has a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.
The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G105M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.