GeForce G105M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 560v and GeForce G105M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 560v
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.79
+147%

ATI Mobility HD 560v outperforms G105M by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11801350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.011.74
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameM96GT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2010 (15 years ago)16 July 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208
Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors514 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate17.604.000
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.03424 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data38
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
God of War 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
God of War 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
God of War 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
God of War 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.32
Recency 5 May 2010 16 July 2009
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 14 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 560v has a 146.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

GeForce G105M, on the other hand, has a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 7.1% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G105M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Mobility Radeon HD 560v
NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GeForce G105M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 560v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 74 votes

Rate GeForce G105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 560v or GeForce G105M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.