Arc A380 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

Place in the ranking	1202	334
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	43.70
Power efficiency	2.80	14.87
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Park	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	80	1024
Core clock speed	750 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	292 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	6.000	131.2
Floating-point processing power	0.12 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	8	64
Tensor Cores	no data	128
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.6
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 0.61

Arc A380 16.20
+2556%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 236

Arc A380 6229
+2539%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5470 1270

Arc A380 53979
+4152%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

1−2

−4600%

47
+4600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −422%	47 +422%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −311%	37 +311%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1467%	94 +1467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −244%	31 +244%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −700%	64 +700%
Fortnite	1−2 −8800%	85−90 +8800%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1233%	80 +1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1178%	110−120 +1178%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −680%	35−40 +680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
World of Tanks	16−18 −1100%	200−210 +1100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −200%	27 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −625%	55−60 +625%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1178%	110−120 +1178%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
World of Tanks	2−3 −5500%	110−120 +5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Valorant	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%
Dota 2	14−16 −2233%	350−400 +2233%
Valorant	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	63 +0%	63 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Dota 2	33 +0%	33 +0%
Elden Ring	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	33 +0%	33 +0%
Metro Exodus	44 +0%	44 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Elden Ring	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Elden Ring	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Fortnite	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5470 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 4600% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 8800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A380 is ahead in 27 tests (50%)
there's a draw in 27 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.61	16.20
Recency	7 January 2010	14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5470 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 2555.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5470 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.