ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility FireGL V5700 with Mobility Radeon HD 3470, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
2008
512 MB GDDR3
0.33
+57.1%

Mobility V5700 outperforms Mobility HD 3470 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13441429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.42
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameM86M82
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2008 (17 years ago)7 January 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12040
Core clock speed600 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors378 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8002.720
Floating-point processing power0.144 TFLOPS0.0544 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache128 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)10.1
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4%
24−27
−4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 performs better in 11 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.21
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB

ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Mobility FireGL V5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility FireGL V5700 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3470 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility FireGL V5700
Mobility FireGL V5700
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470
Mobility Radeon HD 3470

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Mobility FireGL V5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 62 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility FireGL V5700 or Mobility Radeon HD 3470, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.