UHD Graphics 730 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5430 with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 7 Watt
0.33

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5430 by a whopping 1161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1301687
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Power efficiency3.2319.00
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameParkRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00018.60
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs46
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−1150%
350−400
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 4.16
Recency 7 January 2010 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5430 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has a 1160.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5430 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1272 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.