RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5430 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 7 Watt
0.34

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell outperforms Mobility HD 5430 by a whopping 21668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134713
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.7318.96
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameParkGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8014080
Core clock speed500 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2377 MHz
Number of transistors292 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001,045.9
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS66.94 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110
L1 Cache8 KB13.8 MB
L2 Cache128 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−21150%
850−900
+21150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−21329%
1500−1550
+21329%
Valorant 24−27
−21631%
5650−5700
+21631%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−21329%
3000−3050
+21329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%
Dota 2 10−11
−21400%
2150−2200
+21400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−21150%
850−900
+21150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−21329%
1500−1550
+21329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20900%
1050−1100
+20900%
Valorant 24−27
−21631%
5650−5700
+21631%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%
Dota 2 10−11
−21400%
2150−2200
+21400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−21150%
850−900
+21150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−21329%
1500−1550
+21329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20900%
1050−1100
+20900%
Valorant 24−27
−21631%
5650−5700
+21631%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−21567%
650−700
+21567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−21150%
850−900
+21150%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−19900%
400−450
+19900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−21329%
3000−3050
+21329%
Valorant 2−3
−19900%
400−450
+19900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−20900%
210−220
+20900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−19900%
400−450
+19900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 74.01
Recency 7 January 2010 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 300 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5430 has 4185.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 21667.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5430 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430
Mobility Radeon HD 5430
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 340 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5430 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.