Radeon RX 6600 XT vs ATI Mobility HD 5165

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5165 with Radeon RX 6600 XT, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5165
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.96

6600 XT outperforms Mobility HD 5165 by a whopping 3774% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1144124
Place by popularitynot in top-10091
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.27
Power efficiency2.2218.81
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameM96Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)30 July 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed600 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors514 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20331.4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache64 KB512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

ATI Mobility HD 5165 0.96
RX 6600 XT 37.19
+3774%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5165 2789
RX 6600 XT 88163
+3061%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−4033%
124
+4033%
1440p1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
4K1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.06
1440pno data5.57
4Kno data9.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3850%
79
+3850%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
78
+3800%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−7450%
151
+7450%
Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2086%
150−160
+2086%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−15800%
159
+15800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
Valorant 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−1012%
270−280
+1012%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
Dota 2 14−16
−1033%
170
+1033%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6950%
141
+6950%
Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2086%
150−160
+2086%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−14100%
142
+14100%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9400%
95
+9400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2833%
176
+2833%
Valorant 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3350%
69
+3350%
Dota 2 14−16
−700%
120
+700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6550%
133
+6550%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2086%
150−160
+2086%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1450%
90−95
+1450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1622%
150−160
+1622%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1550%
99
+1550%
Valorant 30−35
−642%
230−240
+642%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3267%
100−110
+3267%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4533%
270−280
+4533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−1650%
170−180
+1650%
Valorant 1−2
−26000%
260−270
+26000%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 40
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
105
+10400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3700%
110−120
+3700%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−4600%
45−50
+4600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7500%
75−80
+7500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−327%
64
+327%
Valorant 5−6
−4740%
240−250
+4740%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+0%
135
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Dota 2 86
+0%
86
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5165 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 4033% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 6700% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 3900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 26000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT performs better in 44 tests (68%)
  • there's a draw in 21 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 37.19
Recency 7 January 2010 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 160 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5165 has 357.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 3774% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5204 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5165 or Radeon RX 6600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.