Quadro P2200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5165

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5165 with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5165
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
1.01

P2200 outperforms Mobility HD 5165 by a whopping 2129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1156283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2223.11
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameM96GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)10 June 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201280
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors514 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20119.4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs840
TMUs3280
L1 Cache64 KB480 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1280 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Valorant 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−2100%
550−600
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Dota 2 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Valorant 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Dota 2 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Valorant 30−35
−1997%
650−700
+1997%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−2082%
240−250
+2082%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 22.51
Recency 7 January 2010 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5165 has 114% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 2129% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 244% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5165 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 465 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5165 or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.