NVS 810 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 with NVS 810, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.41

NVS 810 outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by a whopping 568% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1326851
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.103.10
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameM92GM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (16 years ago)4 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80512 ×2
Core clock speed720 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistors242 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76033.06 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs416 ×2
TMUs832 ×2
L1 Cache16 KB256 KB
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs8x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Valorant 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 2.74
Recency 7 January 2010 4 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 68 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has 353% lower power consumption.

NVS 810, on the other hand, has a 568% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5145 is a notebook graphics card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or NVS 810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.