GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5145 and GeForce Go 7900 GTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5145
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
0.36

7900 outperforms Mobility HD 5145 by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13181231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.931.09
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameM92G71
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)18 April 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8032
Core clock speed720 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76012.00
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs824
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s38.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 27−30
−7.4%
27−30
+7.4%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 1−2

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Go 7900 GTX is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 7900 GTX performs better in 22 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.61
Recency 7 January 2010 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5145 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Go 7900 GTX, on the other hand, has a 69.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5145 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5145
Mobility Radeon HD 5145
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 45 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5145 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5145 or GeForce Go 7900 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.