Radeon Pro 5300M vs ATI Mobility HD 4850

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4850 with Radeon Pro 5300M, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 4850
2009
1 GB GDDR3
1.51

Pro 5300M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4850 by a whopping 836% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking967362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.34
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameM98Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001280
Core clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors956 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00100.0
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−754%
350−400
+754%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Fortnite 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 45−50
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−491%
190−200
+491%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Dota 2 18−20
−384%
90−95
+384%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Fortnite 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2000%
60−65
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Dota 2 18−20
−384%
90−95
+384%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−663%
60−65
+663%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−430%
50−55
+430%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−443%
35−40
+443%
Valorant 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1540%
80−85
+1540%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−970%
100−110
+970%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−769%
130−140
+769%
Valorant 9−10
−1556%
140−150
+1556%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−520%
30−35
+520%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−967%
30−35
+967%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Valorant 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Dota 2 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4850 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 754% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 2800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 49 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 14.13
Recency 9 January 2009 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm

Pro 5300M has a 835.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 173 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4850 or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.