HD Graphics 6000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850

Place in performance ranking	902	814
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.15	0.20
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)	Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)
GPU code name	M98	Broadwell GT3
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	5 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	$187	$286

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 6000 has 33% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 4850.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	800	48
Core clock speed	500 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1000 MHz
Number of transistors	956 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.00	48.00
Floating-point performance	800.0 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 4850 and HD Graphics 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	850 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4850 1.63

HD Graphics 6000 2.19
+34.4%

HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4850 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 4850 5264

HD Graphics 6000 6188
+17.6%

HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4850 by 18% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

41
+173%

−173%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%