Radeon 780M vs ATI Mobility HD 4670

Place in the ranking	1052	300
Place by popularity	not in top-100	46
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)	RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	M96-XT	Phoenix
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	768
Core clock speed	675 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	21.60	139.2
Floating-point processing power	0.432 gflops	8.909 gflops
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 1.22

Radeon 780M 18.31
+1401%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 4670 3005

Radeon 780M 40817
+1259%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −1700%	36 +1700%
1440p	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
4K	0−1	15

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1200%

39
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1533%	45−50 +1533%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −5650%	110−120 +5650%
Hitman 3	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −650%	60−65 +650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −172%	85−90 +172%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −700%	24 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1533%	45−50 +1533%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −5650%	110−120 +5650%
Hitman 3	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −575%	54 +575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −282%	40−45 +282%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −172%	85−90 +172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −667%	23 +667%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4200%	40−45 +4200%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −5650%	110−120 +5650%
Hitman 3	6−7 −483%	35−40 +483%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −279%	53 +279%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −475%	46 +475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −164%	29 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +77.8%	18 −77.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2350%

45−50
+2350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	20−22
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −825%	35−40 +825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	20
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −1733%	110−120 +1733%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−650%

30−33
+650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

14−16

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	10−11
Far Cry 5	0−1	10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−433%

16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

30−33

+0%

30−33

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +0%	15 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +0%	17 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4670 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

Radeon 780M is 1700% faster in 1080p
Radeon 780M is 2000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4670 is 78% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 780M is 5650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

ATI Mobility HD 4670 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.22	18.31
Recency	9 January 2009	5 January 2023
Chip lithography	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	54 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4670 has 54.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has a 1400.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.