UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Place in performance ranking	1063	619
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	M96	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	48
Core clock speed	550 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	no data
Floating-point performance	320.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 4650 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 4650 1.04

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.54
+337%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4650 by 337% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 4650 2413

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
+341%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4650 by 341% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−6.3%

17
+6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−267%

11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Hitman 3	3−4 −433%	16 +433%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −133%	21 +133%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −267%	22 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Hitman 3	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −66.7%	20 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +0%	9 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −400%	15 +400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +0%	12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −167%	8 +167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−1100%

12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	6−7

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%