GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Place in the ranking	1097	963
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.04	2.42
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	M96	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 January 2009 (15 years ago)	12 July 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	384
Core clock speed	500 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	514 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	28.80
Floating-point processing power	0.32 TFLOPS	0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1254 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	80.26 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−50%

24−27
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

+0%

1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4650 and GT 650M Mac Edition compete in popular games:

GT 650M Mac Edition is 50% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.04	1.59
Recency	9 January 2009	12 July 2012
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 4650 has 28.6% lower power consumption.

GT 650M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has a 52.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.