GeForce RTX 3070 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

ATI Mobility HD 5650
2010
1 GB GDDR3, DDR3, 15 Watt
1.37

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by a whopping 4128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking96931
Place by popularitynot in top-10046
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.92
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameMadison ProAmpere GA104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499
Current price$24 $662 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4005888
Core clock speed450 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors627 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15-19 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000317.4
Floating-point performance360.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Mobility Radeon HD 5650 and GeForce RTX 3070 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDAno data8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5650 1.37
RTX 3070 57.93
+4128%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 4128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 856
RTX 3070 43005
+4927%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 4927% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 3188
RTX 3070 88744
+2684%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 2684% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 730
RTX 3070 31020
+4149%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 4149% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

ATI Mobility HD 5650 6036
RTX 3070 154864
+2466%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5650 by 2466% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p15
−3900%
600−650
+3900%
Full HD17
−759%
146
+759%
1440p2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
4K1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3575%
147
+3575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 125
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3375%
139
+3375%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1550%
95−100
+1550%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 120−130
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3280%
160−170
+3280%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4175%
171
+4175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2115%
288
+2115%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5800%
118
+5800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−3010%
311
+3010%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 107
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3050%
126
+3050%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1450%
93
+1450%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 61
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3280%
160−170
+3280%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2400%
100
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1838%
252
+1838%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5750%
117
+5750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1940%
204
+1940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−5650%
230
+5650%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 81
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4067%
120−130
+4067%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2450%
102
+2450%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1550%
95−100
+1550%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3280%
160−170
+3280%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1292%
181
+1292%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2925%
121
+2925%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−12400%
120−130
+12400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−14300%
144
+14300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 63

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2200%
90−95
+2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5850%
119
+5850%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13100%
130−140
+13100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2820%
146
+2820%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 6−7
−1283%
83
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−8200%
80−85
+8200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 48
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 43
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−8800%
89
+8800%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2200%
69
+2200%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5650 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 3900% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3070 is 759% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 4850% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 6600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 is 14300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 surpassed ATI Mobility HD 5650 in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 57.93
Recency 7 January 2010 16 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 220 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 247 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9757 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.