Radeon 740M vs ATI Mobility HD 4570

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.34

740M outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 2279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1304516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data37.87
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameM92Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80256
Core clock speed680 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors242 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44040.00
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−120

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1450%
31
+1450%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−1050%
23
+1050%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−100%
14
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−779%
120−130
+779%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−114%
14−16
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Dota 2 10−11
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
Valorant 24−27
−208%
80−85
+208%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6−7
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 16−18

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 6−7
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−26.7%
18−20
+26.7%
Valorant 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+0%
29
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 740M is 1950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 31 test (51%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 8.09
Recency 9 January 2009 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm

Radeon 740M has a 2279.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 55 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 91 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.