GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVS 3100M

Place in the ranking	1231	337
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.61	37.02
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GT218	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 January 2010 (15 years ago)	23 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	1024
Core clock speed	606 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1125 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	4.848	72.00
Floating-point processing power	0.04698 TFLOPS	2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	32
TMUs	8	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.64 GB/s	112.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.140
CUDA	1.2	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 3100M 0.51

GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.52
+2943%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 3100M 204

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6204
+2941%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 3100M 1121

GTX 1650 Max-Q 30957
+2663%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
1440p	0−1	29
4K	0−1	18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −222%	27−30 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −222%	27−30 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −980%	54 +980%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −222%	27−30 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −643%	52 +643%
Fortnite	0−1	85−90
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1375%	118 +1375%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −360%	23 +360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
World of Tanks	16−18 −944%	167 +944%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −222%	27−30 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −967%	30−35 +967%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −743%	59 +743%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1000%	65−70 +1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1325%	110−120 +1325%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
World of Tanks	1−2 −11100%	110−120 +11100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	14−16
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
Valorant	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Dota 2	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	14
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Dota 2	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
Valorant	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +0%	53 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	52 +0%	52 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Dota 2	69 +0%	69 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +0%	56 +0%
Metro Exodus	36 +0%	36 +0%
Valorant	35 +0%	35 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	44 +0%	44 +0%
Dota 2	88 +0%	88 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	29 +0%	29 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	32 +0%	32 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus	10 +0%	10 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Fortnite	19 +0%	19 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

This is how NVS 3100M and GTX 1650 Max-Q compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Max-Q is 5800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Max-Q is 11100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1650 Max-Q is ahead in 34 tests (56%)
there's a draw in 27 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.51	15.52
Recency	7 January 2010	23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	30 Watt

NVS 3100M has 114.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 2943.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.