Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 4570 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 4570
2009
512 MB GDDR3
0.33

MAX Graphics outperforms Mobility HD 4570 by a whopping 1245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1368706
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.65
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameM92DG1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 January 2009 (17 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80768
Core clock speed680 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.44079.20
Floating-point processing power0.1088 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache64 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−1250%
27
+1250%
1440p1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
4K1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Valorant 24−27
−123%
55−60
+123%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−457%
75−80
+457%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 10−11
−300%
40
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Valorant 24−27
−123%
55−60
+123%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 10−11
−280%
38
+280%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−123%
55−60
+123%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 9−10

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 4570 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1250% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1900% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics performs better in 30 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 4.44
Recency 9 January 2009 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has a 1245.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4570 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 65 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 285 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 4570 or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.